top of page

Hugo Awards 2023: Controversy Over Exclusion of Authors Raises Censorship Concerns.

In a turn of events that has stirred the global literary community, the 2023 Hugo Awards have come under scrutiny for excluding several notable authors and works from its nominations. The controversy centers around the decision to omit RF Kuang's "Babel," an episode from Netflix's adaptation of "The Sandman," and author Xiran Jay Zhao from the 2023 awards ceremony, which was held in Chengdu, China. This marked the first time the prestigious science fiction and fantasy awards took place in China, a country known for its stringent oversight of cultural activities.


2023 Hugo awards. Illustration only. By DALL-E.
2023 Hugo awards. Illustration only. By DALL-E.

The exclusions came to light in January 2024, when the Hugo Awards published detailed nomination statistics, revealing that certain works and authors had received enough nominations to qualify but were subsequently marked as "not eligible" without further explanation. This lack of transparency has fueled speculation and concern over potential interference or censorship by external forces, given the Chinese Communist Party's known influence over cultural expressions within its borders.


Dave McCarty, the head of the 2023 Hugo Awards jury, addressed the controversy on social media, stating that there had been no directives from the Chinese government regarding the nominations. He attributed the exclusions to adherence to the rules and constitution of the awards, though specifics about the eligibility issues were not disclosed. This response has done little to quell the concerns of the global science fiction and fantasy community, with many questioning the integrity of the nomination process and the influence of the award ceremony's location on its outcomes.


Among those excluded, RF Kuang and Xiran Jay Zhao, both of whom have Chinese heritage but are based in the West, have hinted at political motives behind their omission. Kuang's speculative fiction, particularly her "Poppy War" trilogy, draws heavily on Chinese history and has garnered widespread acclaim. Zhao has been vocal about her criticisms of the Chinese government, suggesting that such positions may have contributed to their works being sidelined. Neil Gaiman, whose "The Sandman" was also affected, has previously criticized the Chinese authorities for their treatment of writers, adding another layer to the debate over the awards' impartiality.


The situation highlights a broader concern about the ability of international cultural events to maintain independence and uphold the principles of artistic freedom, especially when hosted within authoritarian regimes. The Hugo Awards, long celebrated for recognizing the best in science fiction and fantasy literature, now face a pivotal moment in addressing these challenges and ensuring the integrity of their selection process moving forward. The literary world watches closely, as the outcome of this controversy could have lasting implications for the relationship between politics, art, and freedom of expression on the global stage.

2 views0 comments
bottom of page